All you have to back up your claims are words. Collecting, repairing and messing around with old x86 hardware is what I’ve been doing for the past 6 years. VIA had a bad name because it was underperforming compared with chipsets from Intel. I just knew someone will say VIA is Cyrix Don’t get me wrong. And I have to prove nothing to you, as you have to prove nothing to me. I don’t have a time machine.
|Date Added:||25 November 2016|
|File Size:||25.33 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Abit VH6T Motherboard Overview – CNET
I have my experience that tells me something completely different. Also if I remember correctly, was slower than BX in some benchmarks. Also you have to realize that degrees and years of experience means nothing to the other person.
I mean, I have seen in the controoler people posting BS not in this forum and after they where getting ridiculed from many members, they where throwing degrees all over the place in a final effort to defend themselves. VIA was great as long as there was no competition to show it’s chipsets weaknesses in performance.
Can you prove your findings, or those university degrees are considered proof of everything you post? Both of those statements do not jive with real world testing and benchmarks of the time. Sunday, January 1st The replacement was a board with VIA chipset.
Universal abit > Motherboard, Digital Speakers, iDome, AirPace, Multimedia
SiS was beating those first versions, with chipsets like the excellent in memory performance. Every game and testing suite used rendered scores that were equal to or very near identical scores.
All you have to back up your claims are words. So, don’t be so sure. contrpller
Download Motherboard ABIT VH6T drivers and software.
Sorry, but I know what I have seen back then. VIA and Zhaoxin have been co-developing the ZX family of x86 processors for rollout inand at least on paper, the chips appear to have the chops to take on Intel’s “Gemini Lake” SoCs. VIA has no such thing to hedge in on the duopoly. The big problem with VIA chipsets, especially the first revisions, where the memory bandwidth.
Look, don’t get me wrong.
It is in fact the slowest of all socket chipsets. I was under the opinion, like yours, and a friend benchmarked VIA vs Intel based mobo’s right in front of me. These are full-fledged SoCs, which completely integrate the chipset including the southrbidge. I’m sure your experience is caused by a aforementioned shitty cheap no-mane via sudio board.
Abit VH6T Motherboard
You really don’t conroller to convince everyone. VIA had a bad name because it controllfr underperforming compared with chipsets from Intel. Collecting, repairing and messing around with old x86 hardware is what I’ve been doing for the past 6 years. These chips could realistically be touted as low-cost alternatives to Intel “Gemini Lake” SoCs, although Zhaoxin is making bold claims about its performance nearing that of AMD Ryzen processors.
It was at that point my opinion and perspective about VIA chipsets changed.
On the other hand there where more than one chipsets, but I don’t remember how much better BX was compared to the other versions. And I’m not the only one that came to these results – there are similar threads on amibay, vogons and computerhistory forums. Granted, VIA isn’t exactly a significant competitor.
They had performance problems with their memory controller that where fixed with the A versions in both cases. Anyway, prove your claims before calling my benchmarks wrong. I managed to clock one of my 1.
You can’t forget that kind of disappointment. The only really good thing they had to show, was their Vinyl Audio.